Tennessee Security Guard Practice Exam

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

What constitutes "reasonable suspicion" for a security guard?

A gut feeling about a person

Any hearsay from colleagues

Facts or circumstances that lead them to believe a crime may occur

Reasonable suspicion is a crucial concept in the security field as it guides a security guard's actions and interventions regarding potential criminal activity. It is defined as a belief, based on specific and articulable facts or circumstances, that a person may be involved in criminal behavior or that a crime may occur. This means that security personnel should rely on observable and concrete evidence rather than subjective impressions or unverified information.

The distinction of reasonable suspicion emphasizes the need for security guards to act on facts or situations that a reasonable person would also interpret as indicating criminal activity. For example, noticing someone acting suspiciously, such as lingering around restricted areas without a clear purpose, may constitute reasonable suspicion. This basis for action is more robust and defensible than relying solely on personal intuition or rumors.

In contrast, relying on a mere gut feeling, hearsay, or a public complaint without supporting evidence fails to establish a legitimate basis for intervention. Such actions might not align with legal standards or could expose the security professional to liability if challenged. Overall, the principle of reasonable suspicion aims to provide security guards with a framework for making informed decisions that prioritize safety and legality.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

A complaint filed by the public

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy